> Quoting Roland Dreier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Subject: Re: [PATCHv6 RFC] IPoIB CM Experimental support > > > Well, randomness is a resource after all, and since we don't have the > additional > > security provided by PSNs in IPoIB UD, it seemed we do not need it for > > IPoIB CM either. So maybe the right thing is just to remove the FIXME > comment. > > random32() doesn't use up any entropy. Random PSNs help avoid problems > with stale connections, so I think we should do it.
Well, stale connections don't pose any real problems for IPoIB CM - worst case a connnection is torn down and recreated. But I don't have a strong opinion anyway - that's why I put the FIXME there. So I'm OK with random32, too. > I noticed some funny code in ipoib_cm_skb_reap(): > > __be32 mtu = cpu_to_be32(priv->mcast_mtu); > > // htonl(__be32)?? > icmp_send(skb, ICMP_DEST_UNREACH, ICMP_FRAG_NEEDED, > htonl(mtu)); > // no htonl() here -- is this correct? > icmpv6_send(skb, ICMPV6_PKT_TOOBIG, 0, mtu, dev); > > what is the right thing? Both are right I think. These two functions seem to accept parameters in different format: include/net/icmp.h:extern void icmp_send(struct sk_buff *skb_in, int type, int code, __be32 info); include/linux/icmpv6.h:extern void icmpv6_send(struct sk_buff *skb, include/linux/icmpv6.h- int type, int code, include/linux/icmpv6.h- __u32 info, include/linux/icmpv6.h- struct net_device *dev); BTW, I just looked at ip_gre.c and it has the same code. -- MST _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list openib-general@openib.org http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general