Kumar: I _LOVE_ the patch and the fact that you're making this code better. I just want to tweak it a little bit...
* Please convince yourself (and me ;-)) that the iw_cm_destroy_id can never block where you've put it. I'll bet that it's fine, but convince yourself too. Your comment scared me a little -- that's all. * Please see if moving the call to reject can be moved to the destroy switch so that we don't have to call it everywhere else. * Please make sure that everywhere we call destory_cm_id, the cleanup of the work queue is also done. Thanks, Tom On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 08:59 +0530, Krishna Kumar2 wrote: > Roland, > > Yes, we will do some "arm wrestling" today :) > > thanks, > > KK > > Roland Dreier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 02/09/2007 05:20:42 AM: > > > Hmm, Steve likes it, Tom doesn't. Can you guys arm wrestle or > > something and tell me if this patch is correct or not? > > > > - R. > _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list openib-general@openib.org http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
