Yes, but if it isn't in scope in the charter the WG cant add it
without going back and getting the charter amended.
It is about a year too late in forming.
John B.
On 2009-09-17, at 9:59 PM, Breno de Medeiros wrote:
John, I agree that this is probably the right decision for the AX 2.0
WG to take, but it needs to be taken by that group in what regards the
attribute schemas.
This WG is probably 6+ months too late in forming. Do you agree?
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 6:55 PM, John Bradley
<john.brad...@wingaa.com> wrote:
This wouldn't cover the other things we need URI for like your XRD
request.
You might want to broaden the registration process to cover
registration of
other uri for openID as well.
John B.
On 2009-09-17, at 9:41 PM, Breno de Medeiros wrote:
I ammended http://wiki.openid.net/OpenID_Attribute_Exchange_Extension_2_0
to include the scope:
"Define a lightweight registration mechanism for AX attribute type
schemas."
If you do not think this is ready for formal consideration by
specs-council, please raise your objection here and now.
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 6:06 PM, John Bradley <john.brad...@wingaa.com
>
wrote:
Even if we go for the big hug theory of cross protocol
Attributes, We
will
still need a schemas group for PAPE, XRD tyoes etc.
John B.
On 2009-09-17, at 7:30 PM, Breno de Medeiros wrote:
Glad to hear Dick back in this list. Dirk, could we immediately
move
to form the AX 2.0 WG (hopefully with a membership that is
representative)? I believe (and not because I am a member) that
the AX
2.0 WG needs to be the party addressing this issue because of the
necessity of preserving some coherence within the AX spec. The WG
should make a formal proposal to either move this into the
umbrella of
OIDF or take it out, and get the bless for spec-council for either
option on a reasonable time frame.
We have numerous speculative threads in this issue. At this
point, the
very possibility of a result (whatever it may be) appears to me
as an
unqualified win.
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 3:23 PM, Paul Trevithick <ptrevith...@gmail.com
>
wrote:
The only difference, e.g., between an Open AX URL attribute and
an
IMI-infocard URL claim is who’s authoritative over minting it.
The
question
for the OIDF is this: Are the benefits of being able to be
authoritative
over the attribute URL minting process, greater than the
benefits of
letting
go of that authority and increasing interoperability in the
overall
open
identity ecosystem?
Paul
PS: The ICF said, hey we need a place for folks using the IMI
protocol
to
know where the attribute URLs are listed. So we created [1]
along with
a
very light-weight email-based process for getting new URIs
added. It
all
works fine. This is clearly one way to answer the above question.
[1] http://wiki.informationcard.net/index.php/Claim_Catalog
On 9/17/09 4:48 PM, "Allen Tom" <a...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
Given that everyone using AX seems to be using axschema.org, we
should
just
bless it. Perhaps the OIDF should take over running it? We
should try
to
have an official process (hopefully very lightweight) for
adding new
attributes.
+100 for making the urls shorter, since AX responses usually
exceed the
2KB
URL limit, and have to be sent via POST, causing UX issues.
(browser
warnings if the RP doesn't support HTTPS, an extra "white page"
with
the
form and the button, JS dependency, etc)
Allen
Dick Hardt wrote:
axschema.org is shorter then schemas.openid.net and implies the
schemas could be used for things other then OpenID
given that though, I don't have a strong preference
On 2009-09-16, at 2:06 PM, John Bradley wrote:
As I recall the idea was to move the URI to use schemas.openid.net
.
Is that still the preferred option from your point of view, or
do
you see axshema.org continuing in some way?
John B.
On 2009-09-16, at 4:54 PM, Dick Hardt wrote:
On 2009-09-16, at 12:28 PM, John Bradley wrote:
Dick,
That includes all of the schema work and AX 2.0 documents?
All the work that Sxip Identity did. I don't recall that anyone
else
contributed.
Who controls axschema.org now?
I do personally
_______________________________________________
specs mailing list
sp...@lists.openid.net
http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs
_______________________________________________
specs mailing list
sp...@lists.openid.net
http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs
--
--Breno
+1 (650) 214-1007 desk
+1 (408) 212-0135 (Grand Central)
MTV-41-3 : 383-A
PST (GMT-8) / PDT(GMT-7)
_______________________________________________
specs mailing list
sp...@lists.openid.net
http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs
--
--Breno
+1 (650) 214-1007 desk
+1 (408) 212-0135 (Grand Central)
MTV-41-3 : 383-A
PST (GMT-8) / PDT(GMT-7)
--
--Breno
+1 (650) 214-1007 desk
+1 (408) 212-0135 (Grand Central)
MTV-41-3 : 383-A
PST (GMT-8) / PDT(GMT-7)
_______________________________________________
specs mailing list
sp...@lists.openid.net
http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs
