Hi Eric

Wearing my spec editor hat, the changes you are suggesting are interesting, but 
not essential to approval of a charter. I give a +1 to the proposal you have 
here:

https://sites.google.com/site/oauthgoog/workinggroupcharter?pli=1

-- Dick


On 2011-09-12, at 3:09 PM, Eric Sachs wrote:

> I received 2 other suggested tweaks.  First, after talking with Tony he 
> explained why it made better sense for the charter to have a broader scope, 
> and then have the WG potentially refine/reduce the scope.  So I added the 
> first sentence in red below to describe the additional area where I am trying 
> to recruit participation.  In the same theme of "broader scope" I tweaked the 
> "out of scope" aspect based on past feedback to give room to potentially work 
> on protocol extensions that might help tune the user experience to better 
> take advantage of an account chooser.
> 
> 
> Statement of Purpose
> 
> This workgroup intends to produce user interface specifications for how a 
> relying party can implement an account chooser for both adding accounts, and 
> selecting an account that was previously added.  The specification would 
> include a definition for the API interaction between a JavaScript widget and 
> RP server that are being used in combination to implement an account chooser.
> 
> Out of Scope 
> 
> The working group is not expected to define non-backwards compatible changes 
> to server-server protocols such as OpenID v2.
> 
> 
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Eric Sachs <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yep, that was one of the specific things I am going to continue to try to 
> recruit participants to work on once we get farther along.  Is there anything 
> in the charter that you think precludes the ability for the WG to include 
> that in the scope?
> 
> Unfortunately I still have not been able to get any proposer or planned 
> participant to show significant commitment to working with Google in that 
> area :-(  Maybe I'll have more luck at IIW.
> 
> In any case Google is going to continue to work on publicly documenting the 
> approaches we use.  I am hoping that if we have something more "meaty" it 
> might attract some others to contribute in this area.  In the meantime I am 
> open to other ideas about how to get some momentum in this area.
> 
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Anthony Nadalin <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> As I indicated before, would like to see the server side be included in the 
> scope, we want this to be successful and not go into the failure points that 
> cardspace did. Without the server side I believe that this will not be as 
> successful and as interoperable as needed
> 
>  
> 
> From: Eric Sachs [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Monday, September 12, 2011 2:16 PM
> 
> 
> To: Anthony Nadalin
> Cc: Mike Jones; Christopher Messina; John Bradley; OpenID Specs Mailing List; 
> Chuck Sievert; Basheer Tome; Kevin Long; Andrew Dahley; Don Thibeau; Wei Tu
> Subject: Re: Charter submission for Account Chooser Working Group
> 
>  
> 
> Thanks to everyone on the specs council who provided feedback.
> 
>  
> 
> By default the proposal becomes "deemed accepted" tomorrow which is 15 days 
> after submission.  A mailing list has been created for the new working group
> 
> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-ac
> 
> I had planned on announcing the mailing list at the OpenID Summit tomorrow at 
> the account chooser session.
> 
>  
> 
> If anyone has any final feedback on the charter before such an announcement, 
> feel free to grab me at the OpenID Summit today if you are in attendance, or 
> just post email to this thread.
> 
>  
> 
> According to the OIDF Process Document "the first obligation of a new WG is 
> to establish and approve its Scope, which should broadly describe the outer 
> limits of the WG’s work."  A number of the comments from the spec council 
> were about the scope, so once we get a good sized group on the mailing list I 
> am going to summarize some of that council feedback to see if we can attract 
> more participants to expand the scope.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Eric Sachs | Senior Product Manager | [email protected] 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Eric Sachs | Senior Product Manager | [email protected] 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> specs mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs

_______________________________________________
specs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs

Reply via email to