Thanks for bringing this to our attention, Atul. It seems reasonable. However, I’m not totally sure how it relates to published draft filenames and the titles and draft numbers within the drafts themselves. Could we schedule a half-hour call to dive into this?
In particular, I’d like to understand how this relates to the specification version numbers (such as 1.0) and draft numbers (such as 29) as described in the OpenID Foundation specification naming conventions described at https://openid.net/wg/resources/naming-and-contents-of-specifications/. Best wishes, -- Mike From: Atul Tulshibagwale <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2023 6:00 PM To: Gail Hodges <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; Mark <[email protected]>; OpenID RISC List <[email protected]>; Tim Cappalli <[email protected]>; Backman, Annabelle <[email protected]>; [email protected] Subject: Re: Versioning proposal Thanks Gail, Mike and Mark, You can also review this pull request<https://github.com/openid/sharedsignals/pull/123>, which has the versioning proposal in a Kramdown format. It also uses that versioning proposal in the SSF spec. Thanks, Atul On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 9:00 AM Gail Hodges <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Atul Many thanks for sharing! Glad you are at a stage to dive deeper into the mechanics of versioning. Mike Jones, Mark H Can you please kindly review and revert to Atuil and the Shared Signals WG? I am conscious that there has been considerable work by the two of you and others in order to: * Document the current specification processes * Document the unwritten best practices * Create tools to automate those processes, and pilot the automation tools with the DCP WG * Close gaps in the Process Document via discrete changes, which the Process Subgroup of the Board will present to Board prior to vote by the full membership. Marie- As Secretary, FYI Gail From: Atul Tulshibagwale <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Monday, September 25, 2023 at 7:55 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: Gail Hodges <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, OpenID RISC List <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Tim Cappalli <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Backman, Annabelle <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Versioning proposal Hi all, In the Shared Signals WG, we recently agreed to this versioning proposal. Shared Signals Versioning Proposal<https://docs.google.com/document/d/111yCtaF26tYUwOUM_Wg_896X1sE64PhtxQx8Bie7INU/edit?usp=drive_web> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/111yCtaF26tYUwOUM_Wg_896X1sE64PhtxQx8Bie7INU/edit?usp=drive_web> I'm not sure if the OpenID Foundation has anything it uses across all WGs regarding versioning. Could you please review the versioning proposal and let us know if anything needs to be changed?<https://docs.google.com/document/d/111yCtaF26tYUwOUM_Wg_896X1sE64PhtxQx8Bie7INU/edit?usp=drive_web> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/111yCtaF26tYUwOUM_Wg_896X1sE64PhtxQx8Bie7INU/edit?usp=drive_web> Thanks,<https://docs.google.com/document/d/111yCtaF26tYUwOUM_Wg_896X1sE64PhtxQx8Bie7INU/edit?usp=drive_web> Atul<https://docs.google.com/document/d/111yCtaF26tYUwOUM_Wg_896X1sE64PhtxQx8Bie7INU/edit?usp=drive_web> Co-chair, Shared Signals WG<https://docs.google.com/document/d/111yCtaF26tYUwOUM_Wg_896X1sE64PhtxQx8Bie7INU/edit?usp=drive_web>
_______________________________________________ specs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs
