The main reason I can see for allowing anonymous comments is because not everyone has an account and they'd still like to contribute feedback to things such as the HCL portions of the wiki. Yes, there is a process for requesting accounts, but in my own experience I never got a response back so gave up requesting one.
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 8:04 PM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <r...@karlsbakk.net>wrote: > > Seems we were being hit by a spambot for the last two days, > > thanks for the pointer. I've deleted the spam comments and > > somebody else already seems to have enabled CAPTCHAS for > > anonymous comments. If this isn't sufficient I guess we have to > > restrict commenting to logged in users. > > There are more spam already. Why should we allow for anonymous comments in > such a place anyway? > > Vennlige hilsener / Best regards > > roy > -- > Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk > (+47) 97542685 > r...@karlsbakk.net > http://blogg.karlsbakk.net/ > -- > I all pedagogikk er det essensielt at pensum presenteres intelligibelt. Det > er et elementært imperativ for alle pedagoger å unngå eksessiv anvendelse av > idiomer med fremmed opprinnelse. I de fleste tilfeller eksisterer adekvate > og relevante synonymer på norsk. > > _______________________________________________ > OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list > OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org > http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss > _______________________________________________ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
