according to the reports I listed, the general consensus is that it's licensed under CDDL ... but I haven't looked at it to confirm.
Jon On 19 December 2011 15:53, Chris Ridd <chrisr...@mac.com> wrote: > > On 19 Dec 2011, at 14:38, Jonathan Adams wrote: > >> http://phoronix.com/forums/showthread.php?65756-Solaris-11-source-code-leaked >> >> http://news.softpedia.com/news/Oracle-Solaris-11-Kernel-Source-Leaked-241597.shtml >> >> Has this been "leaked"? do we want to try to look/keep well clear in >> order to see where ZFS changes are made with encryption, to enable >> support? > > I would suspect that it would be definitely something to avoid looking at, to > avoid any possibility of legal threats from Oracle. > > But what if the changed code in the leaked code was licensed under the CDDL. > Would that make it OK to reuse outside of Oracle? > > Chris > > _______________________________________________ > OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list > OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org > http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss _______________________________________________ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss