On Mon, 09 Apr 2012 15:11:15 -0400 James Carlson <[email protected]> wrote:
> Mountpeaks wrote: > > On Thu, 5 Apr 2012 04:22:04 -0400 (EDT) > > [email protected] wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > I'm back with my pppoe trouble on REALTEK. > > I've made some logging but can't understand what is going wrong. The pppoe > > connection seems to be up, but I still do not have internet access. > > I've pasted my logs here -> http://pastie.org/3757084 > > download link -> http://pastie.org/pastes/3757084/download > > The command output appears to be inconsistent with itself -- as if the > commands were run at widely varying times with different system > configurations. But I can make a guess at the problem. > > Your problem appears to be with routing, not with PPP. > > You have two default routes. That's perfectly legal, but almost > certainly not what you want. > > One default route (to 178.121.0.1) is installed by pppd, and points over > the newly-constructed PPP interface. The other default route (to > 192.168.1.1) was installed by DHCP, and points over the rge0 interface. > > Unless both of those routes describe equivalent ways to reach the global > Internet, and can be used interchangeably, you probably don't want to > have both. > > At a guess, you've got an RFC 1918 (private) network configured directly > on rge0. That's perfectly fine, but the status and configuration of > that network is unclear. > > If the system located at 192.168.1.1 is unable to able to reach the > global Internet, then you do NOT want to have a default route pointing > to that address. It will act as a black hole for packets, causing a > loss of connectivity. > > If, on the other hand, 192.168.1.1 is a default router (i.e., it's able > to reach the global Internet), then you really don't need the PPPoE > connection at all, and it's unclear what you're trying to do. > > So what is 192.168.1.1? If it's a NAT that has a PPPoE connection to > your Internet service provider, then you might not need to attempt to > configure PPPoE on this system. Just use the existing DHCP > configuration on rge0, and be happy. > > If it's something else, then you'll either need to disable DHCP on rge0 > so that you don't get this bogus bit of configuration, or at least > disable the DHCP default route mechanism. > > -- > James Carlson 42.703N 71.076W <[email protected]> > > _______________________________________________ > OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss (ok, you are right James, I probed that data at different times) To connect, I use DSL modem, that is connected to my laptop with cable. On any linux distro I use "pppoe-setup" to configure my connection and it always works. I never use GNOME/KDE network managers. Here is a new log file from OpenIndiana. First, I checked my connection with my cable plugged in and modem turned on. Then I ran /usr/bin/pppoe call myisp, and checked everything again. Please see this log here: http://pastie.org/3758068 My second OS is archlinux, and as said, I use pppoe-start to connect. Here are my logs from arch right after I connected. See: http://pastie.org/3758076 I can't see the problem, as I severy lack knowledge on network interfaces and how they are up on this level. I'm sorry. I hope my logs help. Maybe its OpenIndiana's network manager that somehow interferes with pppoe? -- Mountpeaks <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
