On Apr 29, 2012, at 2:53 PM, Gary Mills wrote: > On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 02:45:05PM -0400, George Wilson wrote: >> On Apr 29, 2012, at 1:28 PM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote: >> >>>>> Also, I posted a bug report for it here >>>>> https://www.illumos.org/issues/2663 >>> >>> Seems the old post about the initial patch is here >>> https://www.illumos.org/issues/453 >> >> Speaking of 4K sectors, I've taken a slightly different approach >> that fixes this outside of ZFS. The idea is to allow sd to override >> the physical-block-size which ZFS will pick up. The way this works >> is you can specify the Vendor/Product id in sd.conf. Here's an >> example: > >> sd-config-list = "NETAPP LUN, "physical-block-size:4096"; > > Yes, since this is a hardware issue, the best course of action would > be to list the offending disk drives in a system file. > > Does the Netapp lie about the block size of its LUNs?
Yeah, this apparently is a common problem when using ZFS and Netapp. - George > > -- > -Gary Mills- -refurb- -Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada- > > _______________________________________________ > OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list > OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org > http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss _______________________________________________ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
