On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 12:50 AM, Richard Elling <richard.ell...@richardelling.com> wrote: > On Jun 11, 2012, at 6:08 PM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: > >> On Mon, 11 Jun 2012, Jim Klimov wrote: >>> ashift=12 (2^12 = 4096). For disks which do not lie, it >>> works properly out of the box. The patched zpool binary >>> forced ashift=12 at the user's discretion. >> >> It seems like new pools should provide the option to be created with >> ashift=12 even if none of the original disks need it. The reason is to >> allow adding 4K sector disks later. > > I don't disagree, in principle. However, history has shown that people don't > plan very well > (eg, reason #1 dedup exists). Is there some other way to be more clever? > -- richard
I believe that the consensus the last time this came up was agreement on that point, but contention over how the semantics of specifying it should work? _______________________________________________ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
