Hi Gordon,

Apologies, missed this the other day.

  My advice would be to make it easier to use IDMU.  The modifications
  to AD to support IDMU are quite widely accepted these days, at least
  in organizations that have both Windows and *nix.
  
  
The problem is that some of the organisations we're used to integrating Mac 
clients with (tend to be FTSE companies) often are pretty much straight Windows 
shops, so anything that deviates from their standard is *really* hard to get 
through change control (especially now where we've been deploying Macs for 
years that "just work" with AD (to a fairly decent extent)).


It sounds like Sun were actually looking at something like Mac OS X's handling 
of external directories at some point (from here:  
https://blogs.oracle.com/nico/entry/dealing_with_windows_sids_in ), but they 
obviously went the other way.


I think now I've got a better understanding of ephemeral IDs (thanks for the 
confirmation by the way) then they make more sense, yet it still feels a little 
like the easier route was taken on the development side, leaving a slightly 
more complicated situation on the administrator side.


Thanks,


James.



  
_______________________________________________
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

Reply via email to