On 2012-10-23 15:41, Doug Hughes wrote:
On 10/23/2012 8:29 AM, Robin Axelsson wrote:
Hi,
I've been using zfs for a while but still there are some questions
that have remained unanswered even after reading the documentation so
I thought I would ask them here.
I have learned that zfs datasets can be expanded by adding vdevs. Say
that you have created say a raidz3 pool named "mypool" with the command
# zpool create mypool raidz3 disk1 disk2 disk3 ... disk8
you can expand the capacity by adding vdevs to it through the command
# zpool add mypool raidz3 disk9 disk10 ... disk16
The vdev that is added doesn't need to have the same raid/mirror
configuration or disk geometry, if I understand correctly. It will
merely be dynamically concatenated with the old storage pool. The
documentations says that it will be "striped" but it is not so clear
what that means if data is already stored in the old vdevs of the pool.
Unanswered questions:
* What determines _where_ the data will be stored on a such a pool?
Will it fill up the old vdev(s) before moving on to the new one or
will the data be distributed evenly?
* If the old pool is almost full, an even distribution will be
impossible, unless zpool rearranges/relocates data upon adding the
vdev. Is that what will happen upon adding a vdev?
* Can the individual vdevs be read independently/separately? If say
the newly added vdev faults, will the entire pool be unreadable or
will I still be able to access the old data? What if I took a
snapshot before adding the new vdev?
* Can several datasets be mounted to the same mount point, i.e. can
multiple "file system"-datasets be mounted so that they (the root of
them) are all accessed from exactly the same (POSIX) path and
subdirectories with coinciding names will be merged? The purpose of
this would be to seamlessly expand storage capacity this way just
like when adding vdevs to a pool.
* If that's the case how will the data be distributed/allocated over
the datasets if I copy a data file to that path?
Kind regards
Robin.
*) yes, you can dynamically add more disks and zfs will just start
using them.
*) zfs stripes across all vdevs evenly, as it can.
*) as your old vdev gets full, zfs will only allocate blocks to the
newer, less full vdev
*) since it's a stripe across vdevs (and they should all be raidz2 or
better!) if one vdev fails, your filesystem will be unavailable. They
are not independent unless you put them in a separate pool.
*) you cannot have overlapping /mixed filesystems at exactly the same
place, however it is perfectly possible to have e.g. /export be on
rootpool, /export/mystuff on zpool1 and /export/mystuff/morestuff be
on zpool2.
The unasked question is "If I wanted the vdevs to be equally balanced,
could I?". The answers is a qualified yes. What you would need to do
is reopen every single file, buffer it to memory, then write every
block out again. We did this operation once. It means that all vdevs
will roughly have the same block allocation when you are done.
Do you happen to know how that's done in OI? Otherwise I would have to
move each file one by one to a disk location outside the dataset and
then move it back or zfs send the dataset to another pool of at least
equal size and then zfs receive it back to the expanded pool.
_______________________________________________
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
_______________________________________________
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
