Hi, There is indeed a much newer version of ntfs-3g on Jean-Pierre André's website: 2015.3.14AR.1. He posted very good results earlier this year. Having these in oi-userland is on the TODO list and would be great. Thanks for your report. Best,
Aurélien À mar. juil. 28 04:08:00 2015 GMT+0200, [email protected] a écrit : > I did some test today with another USB drive. > Here are the results : > > From Linux (NTFS) > $ dd if=FreeDOS-1.1-memstick-2-2048M.img > of=/media/ben/MD/FreeDOS-1.1-memstick-2-2048M.img > 3948544+0 enregistrements lus > 3948544+0 enregistrements écrits > 2021654528 octets (2.0 GB) copiés, 91.5862 s, 22.1 MB/s > > From OI > Jul 28 08:50:42 hostname usba: [ID 912658 kern.info] USB 2.0 device > (usb5e3,702) operating at hi speed (USB 2.x) on USB 2.0 root hub: storage@7, > scsa2usb0 at bus address 2 > Jul 28 08:50:42 hostname usba: [ID 349649 kern.info] USB TO IDE > Jul 28 08:50:42 hostname genunix: [ID 936769 kern.info] scsa2usb0 is > /pci@0,0/pci1028,21e@1d,7/storage@7 > Jul 28 08:50:42 hostname genunix: [ID 408114 kern.info] > /pci@0,0/pci1028,21e@1d,7/storage@7 (scsa2usb0) online > > using NTFS-3g > $ dd if=FreeDOS-1.1-memstick-2-2048M.img > of=/mnt/FreeDOS-1.1-memstick-2-2048M.img > 3948544+0 records in > 3948544+0 records out > 2021654528 bytes (2.0 GB) copied, 15867.8 s, 127 kB/s > > After reformating to UFS > $ dd if=FreeDOS-1.1-memstick-2-2048M.img > of=/mnt/ben/FreeDOS-1.1-memstick-2-2048M.img > 3948544+0 records in > 3948544+0 records out > 2021654528 bytes (2.0 GB) copied, 110.893 s, 18.2 MB/s > > > Yeah, really, something is wrong with the implementation of FAT/NTFS on > OpenIndiana. > Would a more recent NTFS-3G help ? Currently using 2012.1.15AR.8 from SFE. > > Ben > > ----- Mail original ----- > De: [email protected] > À: "Discussion list for OpenIndiana" <[email protected]> > Envoyé: Lundi 27 Juillet 2015 16:24:44 > Objet: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] USB 2 performance > > Thanks for the FAT trick. > I don't remember when the disk used to be NTFS, 1 or 2 years ago. I had to > reformat it for compatibility issues with shiny hardware I don't manage. > > I'll try to reformat it to NTFS and see how it goes. > > Best regards. > Ben > > ----- Mail original ----- > De: "Aurélien Larcher" <[email protected]> > À: [email protected] > Envoyé: Lundi 27 Juillet 2015 16:08:25 > Objet: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] USB 2 performance > > I guess it depends which filesystem you are using, but for FAT yes definitely. > Maybe just a matter of block size in this case. > Also make sure that USB2 is actually used, I found Solaris/illumos to > fallback to USB1 on several occasions. > > Aurélien > > À lun. juil. 27 06:00:21 2015 GMT+0200, [email protected] a écrit : > > I redid the test, it is more around 30-35 MB/s on other OS's actually. > > > > ----- Mail original ----- > > De: [email protected] > > À: "Discussion list for OpenIndiana" <[email protected]> > > Envoyé: Lundi 27 Juillet 2015 15:56:33 > > Objet: [OpenIndiana-discuss] USB 2 performance > > > > Hi, > > > > I always found the performance of USB devices connected to OI behind other > > OS. > > Is it related to the implementation or is it just me (oi159a) ? > > > > For example, same drive transfer (one big file) is : > > - 8MB/s on OI > > - 45MB/s on Linux/Windows > > > > Ben > > > > _______________________________________________ > openindiana-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss > _______________________________________________ openindiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
