> On 21. Feb 2021, at 22:50, Reginald Beardsley via openindiana-discuss > <[email protected]> wrote: > > WTF? > > I had loads of fun with this 4-5 years ago, but was able to put an EFI label > on a 3 TB disk and everything was fine when I moved the disk to my Solaris > 10 instance where I have two in a mirror. > > I'm trying to label a 5 TB disk so I can make a backup before attempting to > fix grub on my Solaris 10 u8 system. > > So I get this: > > rhb@Hipster:/etc# zpool status > pool: epool > state: ONLINE > scan: scrub repaired 0 in 2h30m with 0 errors on Wed Feb 17 17:39:53 2021 > config: > > NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM > epool ONLINE 0 0 0 > raidz1-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c4d0s1 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c6d1s1 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c7d0s1 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > errors: No known data errors > > pool: rpool > state: ONLINE > scan: scrub repaired 0 in 1h39m with 0 errors on Wed Feb 17 16:49:12 2021 > config: > > NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM > rpool ONLINE 0 0 0 > mirror-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c4d0s0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c6d1s0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c7d0s0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > errors: No known data errors > rhb@Hipster:/etc# format -e > Searching for disks...done > > > AVAILABLE DISK SELECTIONS: > 0. c4d0 <Unknown-Unknown-0001 cyl 60796 alt 2 hd 255 sec 252> > /pci@0,0/pci-ide@1f,2/ide@1/cmdk@0,0 > 1. c4d1 <drive type unknown> > /pci@0,0/pci-ide@1f,2/ide@1/cmdk@1,0 > 2. c6d1 <Unknown-Unknown-0001 cyl 60796 alt 2 hd 255 sec 252> > /pci@0,0/pci-ide@1f,2/ide@0/cmdk@1,0 > 3. c7d0 <Unknown-Unknown-0001 cyl 60796 alt 2 hd 255 sec 252> > /pci@0,0/pci-ide@1f,5/ide@1/cmdk@0,0 > Specify disk (enter its number): 1 > > Error: can't open disk '/dev/rdsk/c4d1p0'. > Segmentation Fault > > I was using OI because I knew that Solaris 10 u8 would dump core, but I > *thought* this had been fixed in OI/Illumos. All I want to do is put a UEFI > label on it so I can use it with u8. > > It boggles my mind that I would get a seg fault after all these years. That > was always my favorite bug fix because it was so easy. At least it is if you > can recompile the code. The overhead cost of being able to build OI is > simply more than I am willing to pay. I did get it to compile once *many* > years ago, but I never got a response when I asked on the developer list how > to test the new kernel. > > But then again, I now find myself in a world where it is proclaimed "racist" > to insist that 2+2 = 4. > > So time to take OI down and move the disk to Debian to label it. > > Sigh.. > Reg Hipster 2017 is 4 years old, please use current version. If it still is dumping core, please file issue/let us know. rgds, toomas > > > _______________________________________________ > openindiana-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss _______________________________________________ openindiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] "format -e" segmentation fault attempting to label a 5 TB disk in Hipster 2017.10
Toomas Soome via openindiana-discuss Sun, 21 Feb 2021 12:54:00 -0800
- [OpenIndiana-discuss] "for... Reginald Beardsley via openindiana-discuss
- Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] ... Toomas Soome via openindiana-discuss
- Re: [OpenIndiana-discu... Reginald Beardsley via openindiana-discuss
- Re: [OpenIndiana-d... Richard L. Hamilton
- Re: [OpenIndia... Reginald Beardsley via openindiana-discuss
- Re: [OpenIndiana-discu... Jim Klimov
- Re: [OpenIndiana-d... Gary Mills
- Re: [OpenIndia... Reginald Beardsley via openindiana-discuss
- Re: [OpenIndiana-discu... bscuk2
