> On 2. Mar 2021, at 00:29, Reginald Beardsley via oi-dev 
> <oi-...@openindiana.org> wrote:
> 
> That was singularly unsuccessful.  It got confused by all the other pools and 
> apparently FreeBSD 12.2 created a "zroot" pool which was "corrupted" and 
> could not be destroyed in any fashion using zpool. I'll find out more when 
> "ZFS Essentials" , "Solaris Internals" 2nd ed and McKusic et al arrive.
> 

zpool destroy only does work with imported pools. If pool fails to import, 
zpool destroy is no help.


> So I did what admins have done since long before I started using Unix.  I 
> wiped the label with dd(1) and started over.  Boy was I ever starting over!
> 
> That resulted in "format -e" dumping core again.  And even after I created a 
> 4.5 TiB ntfs file system using a standalone gparted disk  it completely hosed 
> the geometry on the drive and put me back in the geometry definition dialog I 
> had not seen since I was running dual 141 MB disks on Emulex cards as LUN 0 & 
> 1 on the same SCSI target.  Sun very helpfully put that feature in the 
> generic 4.4.1a kernel for the 3/60.  That was very useful cutting down the 
> length of the SCSI bus.  With 4 shoeboxes it was fragile.  Just moving the 
> cables would make it fail.  So I consolidated the drives and eliminated 1 
> shoebox and cable.
> 
> In general format(1m) and the install programs cannot find the drive and get 
> correct geometry from it.  I don't recall the SCSI code page commands to feed 
> format(1m) to read the data.  But format(1m) needs some serious work.  It 
> should not dump core.
> 
> As John helpfully pointed out, the text installs on the 2 disks are *not* the 
> same.  And the text install ISO has the very helpful feature of using white 
> text on a light colored background so that people who have macular 
> degeneration get extra help in making their life more difficult than it 
> already is.
> 
> BTW The labeling is inconsistent some screens have "F2_continue" and some of 
> the later screens have "ESC-2_continue", though it's actually still F2.
> 
> Yes, sir.  A real quality product.  No effort expended to make it work 
> smoothly.
> 
> Reg
> 
> BTW I'll see if I can capture what format(1m) says when I tell it the disk 
> speed is 7200 rpm.  I don't recall, but it's pretty funny, I remember that.  
> Even 30 years ago the raw geometry stuff was actually obsolete, though still 
> often needed.  I'm not concerned that my drive is ruined, because it's not.  
> I've been here and fixed this before.  It's just tedious and a bit 
> disappointing to see "format -e" dump core again.  It will be pretty funny in 
> a rather sad sort of way if I have to install Linux or Windows to make 
> Hipster install.
> 

pstack core ?

that “quality product” is made by few people there. If you want it to get 
better, there is simple option - start sending out patches.

rgds,
toomas


_______________________________________________
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

Reply via email to