On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 10:03:07PM +0100, Peter Tribble wrote: > On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 9:46 PM Marcel Telka <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 09:33:22PM +0100, Peter Tribble wrote: > > > On Sun, Oct 20, 2024 at 2:22 PM Marcel Telka <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > On Sun, Oct 20, 2024 at 12:47:00PM +0100, russell wrote: > > > > > Is anyone else experiencing a similar problem? > > > > > > > > > > Yes, reported on IRC. > > > > > > One problem appears to be that the two files > > > > > > /usr/lib/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/2.10.0/loaders.cache > > > /usr/lib/amd64/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/2.10.0/loaders.cache > > > > > > are empty. > > > > > > There are a number of recent commits in this area, but it looks like > > > something isn't triggering the recreation of those cache files correctly. > > > > Yes, we had that problem for several days between Oct 4th and Oct 7th, > > but this issue should be already solved. Hence my request (below) for > > the pkg list -u output. Especially because the illumos-5c4a5fe167 was > > merged to illumos-gate on Oct 15th so my expectation is that such a > > system is already fixed. If this problem happens with the up-to-date > > system then I'm really interested in details and more info. > > > > Copying from IRC: > > 1 -r--r--r-- 1 root bin 0 Oct 18 21:12 > /mnt//usr/lib/amd64/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/2.10.0/loaders.cache > 1 -r--r--r-- 1 root bin 0 Oct 18 21:12 > /mnt/usr/lib/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/2.10.0/loaders.cache > > so, I"'m looking at > /var/svc/log/application-desktop-cache-pixbuf-loaders-installer:default.log > the log seems a bit mangled, but it says, at some point: > gdk-pixbuf-query-loaders not installed > > Apparently, deleting the empty cache files and rerunning the service does > the right > thing.
svcadm refresh svc:/application/desktop-cache/pixbuf-loaders-installer:default should do the same. > One other thing that occurs to me: does OpenIndiana still run a find to see > if the > cache needs to be regenerated due to new loaders? I largely removed all > that logic > because (a) it was quicker to refresh the caches than work out if it was > necessary, > and (b) it was susceptible to timestamps getting out of whack. I'm thinking about doing this as well for OI. -- +-------------------------------------------+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [email protected] | | homepage: http://telka.sk/ | +-------------------------------------------+ _______________________________________________ openindiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
