On Sat, Nov 22, 2025 at 8:06 PM Goetz T. Fischer via openindiana-discuss < [email protected]> wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Nov 2025 16:57:06 +0000 (UTC), Reginald Beardsley via > openindiana-discuss wrote: > > But it meets the replication constraint. Whatever the state of the > machine was, it can be > > reproduced. > > well then an os with a rolling release model is just not the right thing > for you. rolling releases > are changing all the time by definition. > if you want fixed, reproducible states then grab an os with a "regular" > release schedule. > The fact that it's a rolling release is immaterial - exactly the same problem can occur with a set of fixed releases, if they are cleaned up or otherwise modified at any point. -- -Peter Tribble http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ openindiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
