Jonathan Fournier wrote: > I have a 2.6.21 kernel and the all the patches for it from SF v39.1. > > Could it clash with the kernel softdog if enabled? I think there's > another option for other watchdog to register their minor number to > it? I'm not really familiar with that thing. Yes, softdog would conflict. You can't have both (and there's not much reason for both).
That doesn't explain the EINVAL error, though. -corey > > /jonathan > > On Nov 7, 2007 12:49 PM, Corey Minyard <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > Jonathan Fournier wrote: > > Oh but one other thing, what is that: > > > > Nov 7 16:27:08 localhost kernel: IPMI Watchdog: Unable to register > > misc device > > Looks like you have another watchdog driver installed. > > > Nov 7 16:27:08 localhost kernel: IPMI Watchdog: set timeout > error: -22 > > This is somewhat strange. -22 is EINVAL, IIRC. Is ipmi_watchdog.c or > ipmi_msghandler.c patched? I don't see a way this can really happen. > You may have to trace through i_ipmi_request() in ipmi_msghandler.c to > see what's happening here. > > -corey > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Openipmi-developer mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openipmi-developer
