On 05/02/2014 09:10 PM, Don Zickus wrote: > framework. > Implementing read/poll should be easy in the framework. > > Don, are you interested in working on this? i won't be able to get to > it for a bit. > I don't mind doing the work, as long as we agree on an implementation. :-) > > Just throwing an idea out there based on Guenter's reply, should I just > create a new file ipmi_wdt in the drivers/watchdog area that is ported to > the new watchdog framework?
Yes, that's what I would do. I definitely belongs in the watchdog directory. > > The idea is if a user pops up that wants the userspace solution that can > fallback to the old ipmi_watchdog currently implemented. Otherwise the > new port would be the recommended way to go? Seeing that the current > driver is updated fairly infrequent, keeping both drivers in sync wouldn't > be to hard. > > Just a random idea. Yes, that's probably a good plan. -corey ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos. Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available. Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free." http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs _______________________________________________ Openipmi-developer mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openipmi-developer
