On 07/08/2022 18:05, Corey Minyard wrote: >> We had a disscation with Arnd, Arnd asked us to use a fallback as we >> did here if NPCM8XX device module is similar to NPCM7XX module: >> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220522155046.260146-5-tmaimo...@gmail.com/ >> >> I think we should use a fallback to describe the NPCM8XX KCS in the >> dt-binding document. > > I'm ok with that option. I guess I should have mentioned it. Add > nuvoton,npcm-kcs-bmc to the driver's of_device_id table.
To be clear - NAK. It's not a specific compatible, therefore it is not appropriate at all. > Then use that > in that compatible string in the device tree. Leave the 750 compatible > string in the table for backwards compatibility. > > There's no point in having a bunch of those strings if they are all the > same. If a new one comes out that is different, we can handle that when > the time comes.\ There is a point. It's exactly how we do in all DT bindings. It is recommended by writing bindings document. Best regards, Krzysztof _______________________________________________ Openipmi-developer mailing list Openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openipmi-developer
