Hi, On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 4:47 AM, Mike Hommey <[email protected]> wrote: > I just uploaded iceweasel 30 to unstable, which is the first version not > to provide xulrunner-dev. Instead, there is an iceweasel-dev package, > and it most certainly has things missing. Read: I *know* there are > things missing. I just don't know what specifically reverse build deps > would need. > > This is where I need your assistance: could you try building your > packages against iceweasel-dev and see what they are bugging about? > Please file bugs against iceweasel-dev for anything missing you'd > encounter.
At the moment gnash expects npapi.h under /usr/include/xulrunner* dirs. Fixable by making it look for it also under /usr/include/iceweasel*. Will ubuntu move headers to /u/i/firefox*? How about linking /u/i/xulrunner -> /u/i/iceweasel-N instead? BTW would packaging npapi-sdk still be a good alternative? https://bugs.debian.org/642168 -- G..e _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openjdk Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openjdk More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
