So Phil, is that now in b96? On 29/06/2013, at 14:30, Phil Race <[email protected]> wrote:
> For most Windows users and use cases the main differences are that > 1) Previously GDI produced the LCD glyphs, now its DW. > 2) Previously T2K produced the grayscale glyphs, now its DW. > > T2K doesn't do layout. It just does rasterisation. > Most users won't hit the layout path (for complex text). > > -phil. > > On 6/28/13 8:52 PM, Richard Bair wrote: >>> Fonts do look good but I thought they always looked pretty good on Windows! >> With the old code we were using Windows to create the glyphs, so the >> rendering should look just as good for each glyph. T2K was doing the layout >> of glyphs, now it should be using DirectWrite on Windows. Not sure if it is >> b96 -- Felipe? >> >> Richard >
