David DeHaven wrote:
The gradle build tries to find the version of the used Java JDK by running
'java -version', skipping the first line and expects to find the version in the
second line.
However, on Linux (Ubuntu) the first line of *any* Java invocation is "Picked up
JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS: -javaagent:/usr/share/java/jayatanaag.jar"[1], thus failing at
detection of the version, aborting the build.
The 'Pickup up...' line is a standard feature of the JDK and a legacy that
doesn't seem to be removed soon[2].
I guess the build script needs to accommodate for this.
Proposed fix:
// Determine the verion of Java in JDK_HOME. It looks like this:
//
// $ java -version
// Picked up JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS: -javaagent:/usr/share/java/jayatanaag.jar
// java version "1.7.0_45"
// Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.7.0_45-b18)
// Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 24.45-b08, mixed mode)
//
// The first line is optional, we need to parse the third line
def inStream = new java.io.BufferedReader(new java.io.InputStreamReader(new
java.lang.ProcessBuilder(JAVA, "-version").start().getErrorStream()));
try {
String v = inStream.readLine();
if (v != null) {
if (v.startsWith("Picked up")) {
inStream.readLine();
}
v = inStream.readLine();
Why not just use "java -fullversion" instead?
$ java -fullversion
java full version "1.8.0_60-ea-b14"
$ JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS="-Xmx512M" java -fullversion
java full version "1.8.0_60-ea-b14"
$ java -version
java version "1.8.0_60-ea"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_60-ea-b14)
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.60-b14, mixed mode)
$ JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS="-Xmx512M" java -version
Picked up JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS: -Xmx512M
java version "1.8.0_60-ea"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_60-ea-b14)
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.60-b14, mixed mode)
It's a lot less stuff to parse. Also, "java -fullversion" does not start the
VM, so should be faster.
That makes sense as long as the output has everything we need. I need to
make changes in this area anyway for JDK 9 in support of the new version
string (JEP 223). See:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8133750
So this would seems like another good change to do, either as part of
that fix or separately.
-- Kevin
-DrD-