There are some missing javascript APIs in the JavaFX web view. Here is a blog post I wrote a while back on some of my experiments with it. http://sjhannah.com/blog/?p=404
Steve On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 3:27 PM, Kevin Rushforth <kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com > wrote: > One correction. We do not use Nashorn as the JS engine for WebView. There > is an RFE to switch to Nashorn, but it is untargeted. See > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8091505 > > Also, the roadmap is a bit out of date. We'll update it in the next few > days with the information we presented at JavaOne. > > -- Kevin > > > > Benjamin Gudehus wrote: > >> Hi Brian! >> >> >> >>> for unit testing on Linux servers, is monocle a good bet? >>> >>> >> >> In case you simulate user input (mouse, keyboard, touch) you need to use >> the Glass robot instead of AWT robot when using Monocle. I observed some >> different behaviour and timing problems in my tests with Glass robot. >> >> >> >>> when embedding html5 pages into fx apps, should we expect it to >>> >>> >> render/behave similar to popular browsers like chrome? >> >> AFAIK JavaFX just uses the Webkit rendering engine, so rendering should be >> more or less exactly like Chrome (they use their fork Blink, but there are >> not that much differences, yet). For JavaScript execution the Nashorn JS >> engine is used. >> >> >> >>> do you have a public roadmap for fx? >>> >>> >> >> I guess there is some information on the OpenJFX project page. >> >> >> >>> what is status of scenebuilder? Is it supported, and still worked on? >>> >>> >> >> I saw some commits in the SceneBuilder repository in the last few days. >> Binaries are provided by Gluon. >> >> Regards, >> Benjamin >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 10:58 PM, Brian Harris <brianfromore...@gmail.com >> > >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> Hi fx devs, a few questions. >>> >>> - for unit testing on Linux servers, is monocle a good bet? I got it >>> working by adding monocle jar to ext classpath >>> >>> - when embedding html5 pages into fx apps, should we expect it to >>> render/behave similar to popular browsers like chrome? I'm wondering if >>> we >>> can expect this to just work or if things may be a bit wonky. >>> >>> - do you have a public roadmap for fx? >>> >>> - what is your recommendation for lifecycle management, ie creating >>> controllers with injected dependencies. I saw afterburner looked nice, we >>> have spring working too. >>> >>> - what is status of scenebuilder? Is it supported, and still worked on? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Brian >>> >>> >>> >> -- Steve Hannah Web Lite Solutions Corp.
