Hi Kevin, Phil, Thanks for the clarification.
On 19 February 2016 at 23:40, Phil Race <philip.r...@oracle.com> wrote: > We had not forgotten that the other JEP was there (as a draft) > but the new JEP started with a pure FX focus on allowing FX to use either > GTK2 or GTK3 depending on what you needed. > It was extended (feature creep) whilst being drafted to include doing the > same for > AWT/Swing but the focus was still on interoperability. Making the Swing > L&F fully GTK3 based is the later stretch goal whereas the original JEP > is much more focused on that and also not at all on FX. > It would be good for Mario to take a look at the new JEP and identify > any areas in which it falls short of the previous JEP, which would be > one reason to leave the "old" JEP open for now. Another is that it > is unclear how much of JEP 283 we will actually be able to deliver for > JDK 9 and it is written in a way which is intended to allow for that. > In which case the previous JEP may yet be needed to complete that work, > so we don't know yet it if it will be completely subsumed by that work. > > -phil. > > > On 02/19/2016 07:43 AM, Kevin Rushforth wrote: > >> Current plan is to track all of the work for both JavaFX and Swing with >> this JEP. >> >> -- Kevin >> >> >> Anirvan Sarkar wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> One of the sub-task of this JEP is to 'Rework Swing GTK LnF to support >>> GTK-3'. >>> This seems something in common with another submitted JEP [1]: 'Modernize >>> the GTK3 Look and Feel implementation'. >>> >>> So will these two JEP complement each other or will the other one be now >>> redundant ? >>> >>> >>> [1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8065658 >>> >>> On 19 February 2016 at 07:11, <mark.reinh...@oracle.com> wrote: >>> >>> New JEP Candidate: http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/283 >>>> >>>> - Mark >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> > -- Anirvan
