This one is still targeted to 9, and so far as I can tell that has
always been the case.
The "release team" for the whole JDK 9 release have allowed that bugs
that existed
in 8 GA may be deferred out of 9 if there is not time to fix them.
The logic behind that is (I think) that it is not a regression that
stops you moving
from 8 to 9 if it already existed since 8 GA.
This one is more subtle than that .. it did not start to manifest until
versions
of MacOS later than any available when 8 GA shipped.
Regardless of labels it is clear that this is one that needs to be
addressed.
-phil.
On 9/13/16, 8:10 AM, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
We're using that label to track JavaFX, AWT, Java2D, and Swing bugs
that have been moved out of JDK 9, but which we would still like to
fix if time permits.
-- Kevin
Scott Palmer wrote:
I just noticed it was applied to a bug I am watching, JDK-8089573
(JavaFX
printing does not work on Mac)
The issue seems to be more critical to me than what the words
"nicetohave"
would imply, but perhaps it simply means that it has been deferred?
Scott
