I was waiting for the revised JDK 9 schedule before addressing this
(it's still being finalized). In any case, I will check with the JDK 9
release team as to whether such an RFE could be accepted.
-- Kevin
Alexander Nyssen wrote:
Hi Kevin,
has there been any decision related to JDK-8166242 (Removal of
com.sun.javafx.embed.AbstractEvents) yet? I was a bit busy the last
weeks anyway, but I would still like to investigate JDK-8159227
(FXCanvas should properly forward consumption state of key events from
SWT to embedded scene) for JavaFX-9 (the workaround for it is rather
nasty). As the fix for JDK-8159227 would probably result in conflicts
with the one for JDK-8166242, it would be good to know how you plan to
proceed with JDK-8166242.
Best Regards,
Alexander
Am 22.09.2016 um 14:21 schrieb Kevin Rushforth
<kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com <mailto:kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com>>:
Hi Alexander,
Since this is an enhancement, it needs to go through the FC extension
process indicated here:
http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk9/fc-extension-process
First and foremost, we will need to assess the impact of the change
and whether this is the right time to consider such a change. I note
that since this does not add additional functionality, but just
refactors existing functionality to be easier to maintain, we might
at least consider it when/if the recently announced schedule slip for
JDK 9 becomes effective.
-- Kevin
Alexander Nyssen wrote:
Hallo Kevin, Alexander Z, Vadim,
I have created an initial patch for the replacement of
AbstractEvents with direct usage of JavaFX representations:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8166242
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~anyssen/8166242/webrev.00/
Best Regards,
Alexander
