Yes, me too. I think it’s logical to establish *how* to make contributions first (and it’s great to see a lot of progress with this so far) but then there clearly needs to be a discussion of exactly *what* those contributions are, who decides which ones are important or permitted and how are they prioritised.
I have no experience in the “how” aspect of all this but I certainly have a large “wish list” of potential contributions :-) > On 6 Feb 2018, at 01:48, Paul Ray Russell <paulrussel...@gmail.com> wrote: > > "I think a discussion on "where we should take the platform" is a good > one to have...just not as part of this thread. " > > I'm looking forwards to the new thread :)
