Seems good to me, too.
-- Kevin
Michael Ennen wrote:
Sounds like a good idea to me to only have `getScreenCapture` methods
that have a WritableImage parameter which can be `null` which means a
new WritableImage will be created otherwise the given one is re-used, as
in Scene.snapshot and Node.snapshot. What are your thoughts on this,
Kevin?
On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 6:11 PM, Scott Palmer <swpal...@gmail.com
<mailto:swpal...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On Mar 23, 2018, at 5:50 PM, Michael Ennen <mike.en...@gmail.com
<mailto:mike.en...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Kevin,
I believe I followed all of your suggestions, except the one with a
re-usable WritableImage.
If you want me to implement that as well, I can, but you seemed
unsure
about the necessity
of it.
I think it should be included to reduce garbage generated in a
case where repeated captures is used. Such as a desktop sharing
application, a screen recorder, etc.
It would also be consistent with the node.snapshot API.
In fact, I would just have the version that takes a WriteableImage
and match the behaviour of node.snapshot.
Scott
--
Michael Ennen
