I'm all in favor of following W3C CSS, but you can't specify negative values in W3C CSS line-height property either. The minimum value is 0 which just collapses everything into the same line, so negative values wouldn't make sense since it would layout the paragraph upside down.
Cheers, I looked at the source and it is a double property that is just added to > the default line height > So I don't see why it would just cause line wrap to fail such that text > was all on the same line, > which is how I am interpreting what you are saying. > Perhaps if you are using too large a negative value something I'm > overlooking is clamping it .. > FWIW line-spacing is not a W3C CSS property so far as I can tell, so it > is just FX CSS > There is line-height in the W3C spec but it is specified differently. > -phil. -- Pedro Duque Vieira
