It should. I have the following: javafx.version = 11.0.1-ea Are you using an SDK or maven artifacts? For which platform?
- Johan On Sun, Nov 4, 2018 at 4:07 PM Michael Paus <m...@jugs.org> wrote: > My application is reporting the following values for the respective > properties: > > java.runtime.version: 11.0.1+13 > java.class.version: 55.0 > java.version: 11.0.1 > javafx.version: 11 > > Shouldn't "javafx.version" follow the same naming conventions as used by > "java.version"? > > > Am 02.11.18 um 09:59 schrieb Johan Vos: > > Hi, > > > > We are about to release JavaFX 11.0.1, containing the fixes that made it > > into the 11-dev repository. > > An early-access build for this is available as SDK/jmods at > > > http://download2.gluonhq.com/openjfx/11.0.1/openjfx-11.0.1-ea+1_linux-x64_bin-jmods.zip > > > http://download2.gluonhq.com/openjfx/11.0.1/openjfx-11.0.1-ea+1_linux-x64_bin-sdk.zip > > > http://download2.gluonhq.com/openjfx/11.0.1/openjfx-11.0.1-ea+1_osx-x64_bin-jmods.zip > > > http://download2.gluonhq.com/openjfx/11.0.1/openjfx-11.0.1-ea+1_osx-x64_bin-sdk.zip > > < > http://download2.gluonhq.com/openjfx/11.0.1/openjfx-11.0.1-ea+1_linux-x64_bin-sdk.zip > > > > > http://download2.gluonhq.com/openjfx/11.0.1/openjfx-11.0.1-ea+1_windows-x64_bin-jmods.zip > > > http://download2.gluonhq.com/openjfx/11.0.1/openjfx-11.0.1-ea+1_windows-x64_bin-sdk.zip > > > > The maven artifacts are available in the usual repositories, with version > > tag being "11.0.1-ea+1" e.g. > > > > org.openjfx:javafx-base:11.0.1-ea+1 (see > > http://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/org/openjfx/javafx-base/11.0.1-ea+1/ > ) > > > > If we don't hear major issues with this ea, it should become the 11.0.1 > > release. > > > > - Johan > > >
