THanks, Kevin, and my apologies for not reading the archives Cheers, Martijn
On Mon, 17 Jun 2019 at 18:32, Kevin Rushforth <kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com> wrote: > As mentioned in this message [1], the last release of OpenJFX 8 was > 8u202 in January 2019, in conjunction with the last Oracle-led OpenJDK > release of the same. You can see the 8u202-ga tag [2] in the openjfx 8u > repo. > > -- Kevin > > [1] > > https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/openjfx-dev/2019-January/023039.html > [2] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/openjfx/8u/rt/tags > > On 6/17/2019 4:03 AM, Martijn Verburg wrote: > > Out of curiosity - what was the last release of OpenJFX 8? If I'm reading > > the repos correctly it should be 8u60? > > > > Cheers, > > Martijn > > > > > > On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 at 14:01, Tom Schindl <tom.schi...@bestsolution.at> > > wrote: > > > >> Hi Kevin, > >> > >> Well isn't that true as well for jfx-12 - or is this maintained? What > >> makes jfx-12 different from jfx-8? Or is the plan to remove jfx-12 once > >> jfx-13 is released, ...? > >> > >> Anyways, I accept this and I'll see how I can get that forked to my own > >> github account (once I have a need for it :-) > >> > >> Tom > >> > >> On 11.06.19 13:55, Kevin Rushforth wrote: > >>> If someone wants to create a new project and fork the openjfx/8u-dev/rt > >>> repo there, that would be fine...as long as everyone understand that it > >>> is a fork of an unmaintained code base. > >>> > >>> Since openjfx/8u is not being maintained, neither the > >>> javafxports/openjdk-jfx repo nor the new (for project Skara) openjdk > >>> project on GitHub would be suitable. > >>> > >>> -- Kevin > >>> > >>> > >>> On 6/11/2019 3:25 AM, Tom Schindl wrote: > >>>> Hi, > >>>> > >>>> What I asked some time ago is that the github fork also contains the > >>>> latest u8-state before it got frozen - similar to eg jfx-11, jfx-12 > (and > >>>> most likely soon jfx-13 branch). > >>>> > >>>> This would at least give us all a central place we can create our > forks > >>>> on (I understand nobody is willing to maintain merge back changes > >> there). > >>>> Tom > >>>> > >>>> On 10.06.19 22:29, Kevin Rushforth wrote: > >>>>> I recommend that you upgrade to JDK 12 + openjfx 12 if you want to > keep > >>>>> current, since openjfx-8u is not supported. > >>>>> > >>>>> If you must stay on JDK 8, Oracle is supporting JavaFX in JDK 8 > through > >>>>> March of 2022 [1], so you could check into that (note that this list > is > >>>>> not the place to discuss support, however). Otherwise, you are on > >>>>> your own. > >>>>> > >>>>> -- Kevin > >>>>> > >>>>> [1] > >> https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/java-se-support-roadmap.html > >>>>> > >>>>> On 6/9/2019 7:52 PM, guoge (A) wrote: > >>>>>> Thanks for your reply, Kevin > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I wonder to know if I'm still using JDK8 with JFX8 because JFX 11 > can > >>>>>> not match with JDK8 (as I know), > >>>>>> How can I deal with the vulnerabilities of JFX8? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>> Guo Ge > >> -- > >> Tom Schindl, CTO > >> BestSolution.at EDV Systemhaus GmbH > >> Eduard-Bodem-Gasse 5-7. A-6020 Innsbruck > >> Reg. Nr. FN 222302s am Firmenbuchgericht Innsbruck > >> > >