By using the collection itself as synchronization lock we achieve behaviour that matches java.util.Collections classes.
I've create test cases that fail with the current way of synchronizing on a separate object. I've removed unused constructors. ---------------- Commits: - 7e80839f: 8232524: SynchronizedObservableMap cannot be be protected for copying/iterating - 8ecf3545: JDK-8232524 fixed. Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/17/files Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/jfx/17/webrev.00 Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8232524 Stats: 120 lines in 2 files changed: 95 ins; 17 del; 8 mod Patch: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/17.diff Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx pull/17/head:pull/17 PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/17
