On Fri, 3 Apr 2020 02:11:12 GMT, Thiago Milczarek Sayao <tsa...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Test on 16.04 (without Webkit - it does not build on 16.04 anymore) >> >> Updated April 2nd. >> >>  >> >> Note: DatePickerTest works when run alone. > > I will keep testing it, but I think it's looking good. I see a lot of work going into this. In order for this to progress beyond the prototype or concept phase, we will need to have a discussion on the openjfx-dev mailing list in a separate email thread that is not directly tied to the PR -- meaning not a reply to the RFR thread and not a comment in the PR. @tsayao When you are ready, please send a short email (not a reply to any existing message) to openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net with the following: 1. A short summary of the proposed enhancement 2. The goals of the proposed enhancement 3. A description of the proposed changes (basically, the bullet items from the description of this PR) 4. A pointer to this PR for reference I want to focus the openjfx-dev discussion on getting general agreement on the overall approach rather than on the details of the code changes. This is a big change, so getting feedback on the overall goals and approach is important; review comments in the PR aren't the best way to have that discussion. We aren't following the formal JEP process for JavaFX features, but the JEP template in [JEP 2](https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/2) is a good format to follow for large or high-impact features to make sure that the motivation, goals, and tradeoffs are documented. Finally, I note that this will eventually need a CSR, but that can be done once there is agreement on the approach, and when this is farther along in the review process. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/77
