On Mon, 11 May 2020 04:54:31 GMT, Robert Lichtenberger <rlich...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> @effad I just closed PR #73 due to inactivity. If you are interested >> interested in pursuing this, go ahead and reopen >> this (although you would need to address the feedback that clamping is >> insufficient). > > We're in the process of finishing our products' release. If I find time > I will try and give this (rather nasty) Problem another shot. > > On 2020-05-08 20:51, Kevin Rushforth wrote: >> >> @effad <https://github.com/effad> I just closed PR #73 >> <https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/pull/73> due to inactivity. If you are >> interested interested in pursuing this, go ahead and reopen this >> (although you would need to address the feedback that clamping is >> insufficient). >> >> — >> You are receiving this because you were mentioned. >> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub >> <https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/pull/138#issuecomment-625963496>, or >> unsubscribe >> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABCKAQ6JRLHJSGPI3U2YTNLRQRIB7ANCNFSM4LCNBSIA>. >> Reopening the pull request, since PR #73 has been closed. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/138