On Mon, 11 May 2020 04:54:31 GMT, Robert Lichtenberger <rlich...@openjdk.org> 
wrote:

>> @effad I just closed PR #73 due to inactivity. If you are interested 
>> interested in pursuing this, go ahead and reopen
>> this (although you would need to address the feedback that clamping is 
>> insufficient).
>
> We're in the process of finishing our products' release. If I find time
> I will try and give this (rather nasty) Problem another shot.
> 
> On 2020-05-08 20:51, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>>
>> @effad <https://github.com/effad> I just closed PR #73
>> <https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/pull/73> due to inactivity. If you are
>> interested interested in pursuing this, go ahead and reopen this
>> (although you would need to address the feedback that clamping is
>> insufficient).
>>
>> —
>> You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
>> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
>> <https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/pull/138#issuecomment-625963496>, or
>> unsubscribe
>> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABCKAQ6JRLHJSGPI3U2YTNLRQRIB7ANCNFSM4LCNBSIA>.
>>

Reopening the pull request, since PR #73 has been closed.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/138

Reply via email to