On Tue, 18 Aug 2020 17:49:06 GMT, Nir Lisker <nlis...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> The classes should be inspected to see if one is needed and if its doc is > suitable. This is an excellent point. One of the main reasons for not relying on implicit, no-arg constructors is that you might get a public constructor where one isn't intended. See [JDK-8229472](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8229472) and [JDK-8240688](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8240688) for what is needed if we determine that there should not be a public constructor. To that end, I'll go through it more carefully and comment on this specific question. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/283
