On Tue, 18 Aug 2020 19:50:55 GMT, Leon Linhart 
<github.com+4029915+themrmilchm...@openjdk.org> wrote:

> Hi, this PR fixes 
> [JDK-8251946](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8251946) computing 
> whether the list was
> actually modified instead of just returning `true`. The list was modified if 
> 1. it was not empty (modified by calling
> `#clear()`), or if 2. it was modified as result of the `#addAll()` call.
> 
> If you want any test coverage for this please let me know.
> 
> I reported the issue a couple of days ago via web formula and waited for the 
> confirmation to open this PR but now I see
> that @kevinrushforth (sorry for pinging) is already assigned to the JBS 
> issue. I'm not too familiar with how you handle
> JBS issues or more specifically whether assigning is used to indicate that 
> the issue is in the assignee's "domain", or
> that the assignee is already working on it. In the latter case, please feel 
> free to close this PR. (My OCA submission
> is still pending anyway.)

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: 78570225
Author:    Leon Linhart <themrmilchm...@gmail.com>
Committer: Nir Lisker <nlis...@openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/commit/78570225
Stats:     28 lines in 3 files changed: 25 ins; 2 del; 1 mod

8251946: ObservableList.setAll does not conform to specification

Reviewed-by: arapte, kcr

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/284

Reply via email to