Silly question, is the difference with Windows just the nature of the native support on each platform (Unix based vs Windows) and libraries used as part of that?
Eric Bresie ebre...@gmail.com (mailto:ebre...@gmail.com) > On April 1, 2021 at 4:29:09 PM CDT, Kevin Rushforth <k...@openjdk.java.net > (mailto:k...@openjdk.java.net)> wrote: > On Thu, 1 Apr 2021 20:18:03 GMT, John Neffenger <jgn...@openjdk.org > (mailto:jgn...@openjdk.org)> wrote: > > > > IMHO, it would make sense to merge any clear improvement of the > > > status-quo and debug+fix more in a later PR. "Perfect is the enemy of > > > good." > > > > > > Regarding Webkit, I know of > > > https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=174540 > > > https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=188738 > > > https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/667729 > > > but your version is probably not *that* old. > > > > > IMHO, it would make sense to merge any clear improvement of the > > > status-quo and debug+fix more in a later PR. > > > > I agree that we will have to draw the line somewhere, but right now I'm > > down to just one file on one operating system out of 10,633 files in the > > build output! (It's just `jfxwebkit.dll` on Windows.) It would be a shame > > to give up now. > > > > I would, though, like to postpone tests of static builds and builds for > > Android and iOS. My priorities for this pull request are: > > > > 1. Linux distributions building JavaFX > > 2. Developers building JavaFX from the repository source with the build > > defaults > > 3. Oracle, Gluon, and BellSoft building JavaFX for their customers and for > > downloading > > > > I would be happy to satisfy just the first group, but we might be close to > > getting all three. > > @sashamatveev Can you look at the changes to the media Makefiles? > > ------------- > > PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/446
