Silly question, is the difference with Windows just the nature of the native 
support on each platform (Unix based vs Windows) and libraries used as part of 
that?

Eric Bresie
[email protected] (mailto:[email protected])

> On April 1, 2021 at 4:29:09 PM CDT, Kevin Rushforth <[email protected] 
> (mailto:[email protected])> wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Apr 2021 20:18:03 GMT, John Neffenger <[email protected] 
> (mailto:[email protected])> wrote:
>
> > > IMHO, it would make sense to merge any clear improvement of the 
> > > status-quo and debug+fix more in a later PR. "Perfect is the enemy of 
> > > good."
> > >
> > > Regarding Webkit, I know of
> > > https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=174540
> > > https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=188738
> > > https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/667729
> > > but your version is probably not *that* old.
> >
> > > IMHO, it would make sense to merge any clear improvement of the 
> > > status-quo and debug+fix more in a later PR.
> >
> > I agree that we will have to draw the line somewhere, but right now I'm 
> > down to just one file on one operating system out of 10,633 files in the 
> > build output! (It's just `jfxwebkit.dll` on Windows.) It would be a shame 
> > to give up now.
> >
> > I would, though, like to postpone tests of static builds and builds for 
> > Android and iOS. My priorities for this pull request are:
> >
> > 1. Linux distributions building JavaFX
> > 2. Developers building JavaFX from the repository source with the build 
> > defaults
> > 3. Oracle, Gluon, and BellSoft building JavaFX for their customers and for 
> > downloading
> >
> > I would be happy to satisfy just the first group, but we might be close to 
> > getting all three.
>
> @sashamatveev Can you look at the changes to the media Makefiles?
>
> -------------
>
> PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/446

Reply via email to