On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 16:30:52 GMT, mstr2 <github.com+43553916+ms...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> I think you're right that the same test could also be added for > TreeTableView, and that the test should probably cover the entirety of the > change notification. However, my preference is to not create a test that > duplicates all aspects of the specific program that was attached to the JBS > issue. I think it's more meaningful to test the most minimal setup that can > reproduce the underlying issue; adding bells and whistles (as was done in the > JBS code sample) feels like adding unnecessary noise to the test. Arguable .. we might miss some aspect of the setup in the report when not testing explicitly for it :) ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/480
