On Tue, 22 Mar 2022 02:21:05 GMT, yosbits <d...@openjdk.java.net> wrote:
> I think you are incorrect about the Null Safe explanation. Wouldn't using > Optional solve this? I'm not sure what you are trying to say, the fluent bindings offered by this API are null safe. Using standard JavaFX you have to do additional work to deal with `null`. You are correct that you can use `Optional` to deal with `null`, but that's still additional work. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/675
