On Mon, 12 Sep 2022 13:07:29 GMT, Johan Vos <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hmm. This one especially seems not useful to mention in the release notes.
>> @johanvos can decide whether or not to include it.
>
> This is different to me indeed, as it only touches documentation. I'll remove
> this one.
> In the future, it might be good to have a label for these kinds of issues
> that (1) fix issues caused in the same release version and (2) do not have a
> runtime impact; so that the algorithm for creating release notes does not
> require human judgement. Unless we want to explicitly discuss some of the
> items -- which I'm not strongly opposed to either.
@johanvos In order to automate this, I propose adding the following logic to
the release notes JBS filter:
AND ("Introduced In Version" is EMPTY OR "Introduced In Version" != openjfx19 OR
labels is EMPTY OR labels not in (noreg-doc))
Does this look OK to you?
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/896
