On Fri, 14 Oct 2022 15:03:41 GMT, Douglas Held <d...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> I think this one is OK either as "if" or "if and only if" (if you do change >> it, I recommend spelling it out, although "iff" with no punctuation, would >> be acceptable). I agree with the request to use code style. > > I disagree with both suggestions. > > 1. I think the extra verbosity (while factually correct) adds nothing, for > such a straightforward concept as equality of points in 3 space. > 2. x, y and z are private and are not exposed in the JavaDoc. Further, the > exposed methods getX() etc. that I **could** link to, are not actually what > are evaluated in the method body. > > I'd propose alternately that we keep "x, y and z" but call them "coordinates" > and not "properties". This agrees with other parts of the JavaDoc such as the > constructor, and getX() etc. method documentation. Correction: getX() etc. are used in the method. I will put the methods into code tags. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/913
