On Wed, 26 Oct 2022 22:38:15 GMT, Kevin Rushforth <[email protected]> wrote:
> This PR replaces all occurrences of `State` with `Worker.State` in > `javafx.concurrent.Task`. > > The `javafx.concurrent.Task` class implements `javafx.concurrent.Worker` and > extends `java.util.concurrent.FutureTask`, which in turn implements > `java.util.concurrent.Future`. > > `Worker` has a nested `State` enum, which is used in the implementing `Task` > class without being qualified -- since `Task` is a `Worker`, we can just say > `State` instead of `Worker.State`. > > [JDK-8277090](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8277090) added a nested > `State` enum to the `java.util.concurrent.Future` interface in JDK 19, so an > unqualified reference to `State` from the `Task` class is now ambiguous when > using JDK 19 to build. The javadoc task fails with an error (and the only > reason the javac task doesn't is that we use `--release 17`). > > With this fix, a local build and test using JDK 19 passes. all instances in Task class ------------- Marked as reviewed by angorya (Author). PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/933
