On Mon, 21 Nov 2022 20:42:51 GMT, John Hendrikx <jhendr...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> many of those ^^ appear to be bugs. > > I didn't fix all problems, only the easy non-controversial ones. Things that > might actually be bugs require more careful review and so are best saved for > smaller PR's IMHO. > > This is already fixing around 2000 warnings in 250 files, and before going in > even deeper I'd like to see if this will actually get accepted into JavaFX in > a reasonable time frame (PR's changing large numbers of files don't age well). I only fixed the warnings listed in the ticket :) ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/957
