This transition is complete. Let me know if there are any questions or
issues.
-- Kevin
On 2/27/2023 5:50 AM, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
As a reminder, I plan to make this JBS version change live at
https://bugs.openjdk.org/ on Tuesday, Feb 28th (tomorrow) at 16:00 UTC.
-- Kevin
On 2/15/2023 4:43 AM, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
If you run JBS queries to find or filter out JavaFX bugs, please read
this. Otherwise, you can ignore this.
The unbundled JavaFX versions (11 and later) in JBS follow the
pattern "openjfxNN[.0.MM]". We intend to globally rename all of the
JavaFX fix versions in JBS from "openjfxNN[.0.MM]" to "jfxNN[.0.MM]".
You will need to update any JBS queries that either reference an
explicit "openjfxNN" version or use "openjfx" as part of a regex to
use "jfx" instead.
For example:
openjfx21 --> jfx21
openjfx20 --> jfx20
openjfx17.0.7 --> jfx17.0.7
openjfx11.0.19 --> jfx11.0.19
...
The planned cut-over date is Tuesday, Feb 28. As part of this, I
filed JDK-8302470 [1] to update the JBS version field in
.jcheck/conf. I will prepare PRs for all active code lines and
integrate them immediately after the JBS version renaming is done.
NOTE: this change only affects JBS fix versions. There is no change
or impact at all to those developing or using JavaFX.
-- Kevin
[1] https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8302470
