I propose bumping the minimum version of macOS for which we target JavaFX. The current minimum version of macOS is:

ARM (aarch64) : 11.0 -- this is the first version that Apple added ARM support
Intel (x64) : 10.12

Apple hasn't supported 10.12 in several years (it went out of support in XXXXX), and there is an ongoing *and increasing) cost to our code base to keep building and targeting a system that old. See this PR comment [1] for the latest example. It is also a little awkward to have a different minimum version for the two different chip architectures.

My preference is to change the minimum version for Mac / x64 to be macOS 11.0, matching both the currently oldest version of macOS supported by Apple, and also unifying the minimum for the two chip architectures. We could do that in one step or two steps.

Option 1:

JavaFX 21: Bump the minimum (for Intel platforms) to macOS 11

Option 2:

JavaFX 21: Bump the minimum (for Intel platforms) to macOS 10.14
JavaFX 22: Bump the minimum (for Intel platforms) to macOS 11


There are of course other options, but one of those two seems best to me. Option 1 is more aggressive, but might cause some concerns, given that JavaFX 21 is an LTS. Option 2 is less aggressive, and still gets us away from the troublesome 10.12 release (and dropping 10.13 makes it easier to consider backporting Metal to 21 some day, since 10.14 is the minimum we can support).

Thoughts?

-- Kevin

[1] https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1089#discussion_r1191393521

Reply via email to