On Fri, 11 Aug 2023 21:40:08 GMT, John Hendrikx <jhendr...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> > Looks good now. Do you still prefer to repeat the behavior of the > > subscription in each of the new methods over the centralized one in [#1069 > > (comment)](https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/pull/1069#discussion_r1261873147)? > > I'm really not quite sure where to put that. I don't think it would go well > with `Subscription` since it assumes observables, and things like > `ObservableValue#when`. We'd need to word it a lot more general then, and it > would be hard to refer to `ObservableValue#when`, or general rules about > garbage collection (I think that would depend on the method providing the > subscriptions, which may not have such restrictions). > > Reading `ObservableValue` documentation though, I think it could use some > updating. It mentions change and invalidation events, and their listeners, > but nothing about the subscriptions as of yet. Yes, on `Observable` (invalidation) or `ObservableValue` (change) is the place I was thinking of. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1177#issuecomment-1676566238