We need to exclude from the release notes any backport with a fix
version of 21.0.1 and an hgupdate-sync label. Those bugs were fixed in
21 and are already in the release notes for 21.
Do you have an example where you think the JBS filter excluded something
it should not have?
-- Kevin
On 10/17/2023 7:43 AM, Johan Vos wrote:
Hi Kevin,
After a second look, I'm not sure about excluding the issues with a
hgupdate-sync label. From a previous mail, I understood that those
have to be removed in the release notes of jfx22, but from the backports?
- Johan
On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 4:10 PM Kevin Rushforth <k...@openjdk.org> wrote:
Release notes for JavaFX 21.0.1.
Notes to reviewers:
I used the following filter to pick the issues:
https://bugs.openjdk.org/issues/?filter=44663
The original filter, with the backport IDs, is here:
https://bugs.openjdk.org/issues/?filter=44662
As usual, I excluded test bugs, cleanup bugs, etc. I manually
excludes 4 additional bugs, one of which was a README change (does
not affect the product), and the other three were introduced and
fixed in the same release.
-------------
Commit messages:
- 8317842: Create release notes for JavaFX 21.0.1
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx21u/pull/19/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jfx21u&pr=19&range=00
<https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jfx21u&pr=19&range=00>
Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8317842
Stats: 18 lines in 1 file changed: 18 ins; 0 del; 0 mod
Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx21u/pull/19.diff
Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jfx21u.git
pull/19/head:pull/19
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx21u/pull/19
