On Wed, 10 Apr 2024 21:25:10 GMT, Andy Goryachev <ango...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Adds **Labeled.textTruncated** property which indicates when the text is >> visually truncated (and the ellipsis string is inserted) in order to fit the >> available width. >> >> The new property reacts to changes in the following properties: >> - ellipsisString >> - font >> - height >> - text >> - width >> - wrapText >> >> I don't think it's worth creating a headful test (headless won't work) due >> to relative simplicity of the code. >> >> **Alternative** >> >> The desired functionality can be just as easily achieved on an application >> level, by adding a similar property to a subclass. What is the benefit of >> adding this functionality to the core? >> >> UPDATE 2024/03/07: turns out Labeled in a TableView (in a TreeTableView as >> well) lives by different rules (TableCellSkinBase:152, >> TreeTableCellSkin:126). The consequence of this is that the new >> functionality **cannot** be fully implemented with the public APIs alone. >> >> **See Also** >> >> * [JDK-8327483](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8327483) TreeView: Allow >> for tooltip when cell text is truncated >> * [JDK-8205211](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8205211) Ability to show >> Tooltip only when text is shown with ellipsis (...) > > Andy Goryachev has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a > merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 15 commits: > > - missing ) > - review comments > - Merge branch 'master' into 8092102.truncated > - add exports > - added unit tests > - Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into 8092102.truncated > - test > - Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into 8092102.truncated > - Merge branch 'master' into 8092102.truncated > - labeled helper > - ... and 5 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/compare/0eb4d719...aa28eb4e Testing looks good. Works as expected. The change looks good. Please allow me a little more time to take a more closer look. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1389#issuecomment-2085127845