On Wed, 12 Jun 2024 20:03:24 GMT, Kevin Rushforth <k...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> This PR updates `build.gradle` to define javac lint options for three > different types of java compilation tasks: sdk classes, test classes > (including shims), and tool classes (including JSLC). The defaults for these > three groups of lint options are specified in `build.gradle`. > > We also define three gradle properties that can be used at build time to > override the global lint options for each of the three categories of tasks as > follows: > > * `LINT` - used when compiling sdk tasks : default = > "removal,missing-explicit-ctor" > * `TOOL_LINT` - used when compiling tool tasks : default = "" > * `TEST_LINT` - used when compiling test tasks : default = "" > > Each property takes a string with a comma-separated list of lint options. For > example: > > > gradle -PLINT="deprecation,removal" sdk > > > I provided a build mechanism to add extra per-module lint options in > `build.gradle`. None are currently defined, but I tested the logic to show > that it can be. I did not provide a way to override the per-module lint > options via the command line. Once we start using them, we might consider > adding that. > > While testing this PR, I ran into a few places where we need to suppress > removal warnings for use of our own internal classes that are terminally > deprecated, so I filed > [JDK-8334143](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8334143) to track this, and > added the missing annotations in this PR. > > I also tested with JDK 23 to verify that we are now getting the expected > warnings for the use of sun.misc.Unsafe, and filed two bugs > --[JDK-8334138](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8334138) to (temporarily) > suppress those warnings in this PR and > [JDK-8334137](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8334137) to eventually fix > them by replacing our use of sun.misc.Unsafe. With the addition of the fixes for JDK-8334143 and JDK-8334138 we are lint clean for removal. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1474#issuecomment-2163807534
